Spirituality, as it is conceived by Ostad Elahi, is not based on love so much as it is on developing one’s sound reason. It is a matter of opening one’s reason to the spiritual dimension of things by actively engaging in a process of education of our thought. This education, like all forms of learning, naturally requires a form of guidance, that is, a source apt to teach correct spiritual principles and to accompany the students through the delicate phase of application of these principles. The choice of which guidance to follow is an essential one, for it will determine the quality of the principles that will nourish our thoughts: for example, will these principles be true and up-to-date or tainted and poisonous?
In a chapter entitled “Education of Thought”, the author of Medicine of the Soul provides a number of reference points that can be of assistance in selecting a divine guidance. As a conclusion to the poll The right to divine guidance: how can we make it effective? Debate published a few weeks ago, we thought it would be interesting to recall the main elements presented in this chapter.
B. Elahi explains that a first reliable reference point to identify spiritual guidance is provided by the great prophets and saints of the past. From what remains of the fundamental divine and ethical principles they presented, we can safely adopt those that are generally accepted.
In order to select and extract those principles from the mass of false or accessory principles that have covered them over the years, it is essential to rely on common sense and to set aside our dogmatic assumptions and prejudices. We will then observe many commonalities in the lives and original messages of these saints. For example, all prophets have advised to believe in God, the Source, the Truth, the Absolute… and in the survival of the soul in a world beyond this one. They have all insisted on the fact that, for everything we do here, there is an account in the hereafter and that those who do not do anything positive for their soul here will not have anything there. They have also unanimously talked about the importance of being altruistic, of putting oneself in other people’s shoes and of observing rights.
“The fundamental principles are universal among all religions. Many religious prescriptions have little to do with spirituality and were primarily intended to address social matters (e.g., laws regarding inheritance). Thus, such matters and issues of daily life can be addressed according to various conventional laws, whereas in that which concerns spiritual questions all the religions have spoken uniformly. That is why it doesn’t matter, for instance, if one does not know the particular instructions for a specific prayer or hymn, for in spirituality what matters is observing the foundational principles of religion. Once we have become sufficiently mindful of God, He will guide us however He deems necessary and will tend to us at critical times.”
Ostad Elahi, Words of Truth, unpublished translation, Saying 16.
For those who are not satisfied with religions of the past and who are looking for a spiritual guidance of the present day, the choice they have to make seems more delicate: they should not let themselves be guided by sources that are not authentically divine, by imaginary sources, or worse, by sources that have a hidden agenda which differs from the sincere edification of those in quest of truth.
In this quest of authentic guidance, the essential factor is sincerity: those who sincerely seek divine guidance for the guidance itself rather than to obtain some passing satisfaction for their ego, the Creator will not let them wander or fall prey to spiritual impostors; He will guide them, wherever they are.
As for those who are looking for a guide, the following criteria should allow them to make a choice that will not harm their soul:
- A first criterion is for the guide not to make a living from spirituality or make it a lucrative venture. The relationship between the guide and those who refer to him or her should be akin to the relationship that exists nowadays between university teachers and their students. The duty of teachers is to relay their knowledge to students, without expecting the students to provide them with any kind of personal profit in return. Similarly, a spiritual guide has the duty to make his or her spiritual knowledge available to others without expecting anything from them in return. Being associated with any kind of profit, whether political, financial, sexual or other, is the major sign of falsehood in a spiritual guidance or in a guide.
- A second criterion has to do with the lifestyle of the guide. True spiritual guides look and behave normally, without any eccentricities; they live like ordinary people and use a language that is in keeping with their social milieu and time.
- A third criterion relates to the guide’s teachings. Such teachings should not contradict the fundamentals stated by authentic religions, and above all, it should not lead people to eccentricities or encourage them to seek ecstatic states or other altered states of consciousness…
- Finally, a fourth criterion is to see if the guide encourages a cult around his or her personality. If someone is self-important and pretends being the only one in possession of the truth, it is a sign that they are not a true guide. True spiritual guides—i.e. those who have reached the spiritual level required to be granted the authorisation of guidance by the Source—are so noble of mind, selfless and detached from their ego that they are above any kind of cult centered on their personality.
|Sound reason: excerpt 3 of a lecture by B. Elahi, MD
We are like pupils: our life on earth should be used to obtain the “certificates of primary and secondary education” that will then allow us to go through the higher stages of our process of perfection. [read more]
|Cause for reflection. What do you think?
Ostad Elahi has often insisted on the importance of the principle of causality in spirituality. This principle can be summed up in a simple phrase: nothing happens without a cause. The first consequence that follows is that it is—in principle—always possible to trace back the cause or causes that lead to a specific effect. [read more]
|The twin foundations of ethics: education of thought and respect of rights in general
The processes of assimilation and growth inherent in the concept of “medicine for the soul” are not mere metaphors. They correspond to something real that must be evidenced by experience. It should be pointed out that education of thought is the backbone of spiritual practice… [read more]
- The relation to the divine Source
- The right to divine guidance: how can we make it effective? Debate.
- For a practice of spirituality in the present
This work is offered under a Creative Commons licenceGo to top